Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theoretical Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The myth of punitiveness

Roger Matthews

London South Bank University, UK

There is a widespread claim in the criminological literature that the current period is characterized by a surge in punitiveness and that this ‘punitive turn’ is fuelled by a new populism. However, the key notions of ‘punitiveness’ and ‘populism’ remain largely undefined, with the result that much of the associated analysis is vague, while developments are often asserted rather than explained. Consequently, there is a tendency towards empiricism, on the one hand, and speculative idealism, on the other. It is not that one cannot find examples of punitiveness but since the deployment of punitive sanctions has historically been an endemic feature of the criminal justice system we are faced with question of ‘what is new?’ In this article it is argued that there has been a one-sided, exaggerated focus on punitiveness in recent times, which has detracted from the development of a progressive realist account of contemporary crime control.

Key Words: actuarialism • managerialism • populism • public opinion • punitiveness • toleration

Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 175-201 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1362480605051639


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
D. A. Green
Feeding Wolves: Punitiveness and Culture
European Journal of Criminology, November 1, 2009; 6(6): 517 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
F. McNeill, N. Burns, S. Halliday, N. Hutton, and C. Tata
Risk, responsibility and reconfiguration: Penal adaptation and misadaptation
Punishment Society, October 1, 2009; 11(4): 419 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
S. Parr
Family Intervention Projects: A Site of Social Work Practice
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2009; 39(7): 1256 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
J. D. Unnever and F. T. Cullen
Empathetic identification and punitiveness: A middle-range theory of individual differences
Theoretical Criminology, August 1, 2009; 13(3): 283 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
R. Matthews
Beyond 'so what?' criminology: Rediscovering realism
Theoretical Criminology, August 1, 2009; 13(3): 341 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
D. Johnson
Anger about crime and support for punitive criminal justice policies
Punishment Society, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 51 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
P. O'Malley
Experiments in risk and criminal justice
Theoretical Criminology, November 1, 2008; 12(4): 451 - 469.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
P. Almond
Public Perceptions of Work-Related Fatality Cases: Reaching the Outer Limits of 'Populist Punitiveness'?
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 448 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
S. Tombs
'Violence', Safety Crimes and Criminology
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2007; 47(4): 531 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
S. Field
Practice Cultures and the 'New' Youth Justice in (England and) Wales
Br. J. Criminol., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 311 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
E. O'Sullivan and I. O'Donnell
Coercive confinement in the Republic of Ireland: The waning of a culture of control
Punishment Society, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 27 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime Media CultureHome page
P. Mason
Lies, distortion and what doesn't work: Monitoring prison stories in the British media
Crime Media Culture, December 1, 2006; 2(3): 251 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
S. Hutchinson
Countering catastrophic criminology: Reform, punishment and the modern liberal compromise
Punishment Society, October 1, 2006; 8(4): 443 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
P. Mascini and D. Houtman
Rehabilitation and Repression: Reassessing their Ideological Embeddedness
Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2006; 46(5): 822 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
E. K. Brown
The dog that did not bark: Punitive social views and the 'professional middle classes'
Punishment Society, July 1, 2006; 8(3): 287 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]