|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Private security and crime control
Anne-Marie Singh
Toronto, Canada
This article argues that the persistence of coercive tactics is not just limited to the excluded, the anti-citizens. It explores the routine use of coercion in contemporary practices for the government of conduct. Rather than simply seen as repressive or negative, such strategies are best regarded as productive, seeking to shape individual agency in particular ways. I point to the range of punitive measures operated by private security and highlight the multiple objectifications of the governed that these specify.
Key Words: coercion crime control governing private security responsibility
Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 9, No. 2,
153-174 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1362480605051638

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Donohue and D. Moore
When is an offender not an offender?: Power, the client and shifting penal subjectivities
Punishment Society,
July 1, 2009;
11(3):
319 - 336.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Monahan
Identity theft vulnerability: Neoliberal governance through crime construction
Theoretical Criminology,
May 1, 2009;
13(2):
155 - 176.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kempa and A.-M. Singh
Private security, political economy and the policing of race: Probing global hypotheses through the case of South Africa
Theoretical Criminology,
August 1, 2008;
12(3):
333 - 354.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zedner
Liquid security: Managing the market for crime control
JCriminology and Criminal Justice,
August 1, 2006;
6(3):
267 - 288.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|