Theoretical Criminology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 191-210 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1362480604042243
© 2004 SAGE Publications

Emotional Dynamics in Restorative Conferences

Nathan Harris

University of Cambridge, UK

Lode Walgrave

Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium

John Braithwaite

Australian National University, Australia

Restorative justice interventions, which focus upon repairing the harm caused by an offence, are consistent with the approach advocated by reintegrative shaming theory. However, some have argued that remorse and empathy play a more important role in restoration, and that a focus upon disapproval and the emotion of shame may be misguided. This article analyses theoretical distinctions between shame and guilt before discussing their role in restorative interventions. It is argued that emotions like empathy, remorse and guilt will spill over into feelings of shame, and that it is the resolution of these emotions that is critical for successful justice interventions.

Key Words: emotions • guilt • reintegration • restorative justice • shame • shaming


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
G. Robinson and J. Shapland
Reducing Recidivism: A Task for Restorative Justice?
Br. J. Criminol., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 337 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
J. Stubbs
Beyond apology?: Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 169 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
J. Dignan, A. Atkinson, H. Atkinson, M. Howes, J. Johnstone, G. Robinson, J. Shapland, and A. Sorsby
Staging restorative justice encounters against a criminal justice backdrop: A dramaturgical analysis
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2007; 7(1): 5 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
J. Shapland, A. Atkinson, H. Atkinson, E. Colledge, J. Dignan, M. Howes, J. Johnstone, G. Robinson, and A. Sorsby
Situating restorative justice within criminal justice
Theoretical Criminology, November 1, 2006; 10(4): 505 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]