Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theoretical Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huggins, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Glebbeek, M.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Women Studying Violent Male Institutions:

Cross-Gendered Dynamics in Police Research on Secrecy and Danger

Martha K. Huggins

Union College, New York, USA

Marie-Louise Glebbeek

University of Utrecht, the Netherlands

To promote discussions of methodological issues associated with cross-gender research in criminology, we focus on two women's studies of Latin American police. This uncovered five working propositions about women studying organizations dominated numerically and structurally by men. First, feminist scholarship provides some guidelines for such research, but its applicability is neither direct nor immediate. Second, for example, much cross-gender research requires negotiating and maintaining power differentials between researcher and researched. Third, particularly in cross-gender research on secrecy and danger, inter-gender dynamics can thwart some research objectives and promote others. Fourth, inter-gender dynamics can complicate the ethical dilemmas associated with research on powerful agents and agencies of the state. Finally, the emotional reflexivity associated with such inter-gender research is epistemologically relevant for understanding research outcomes.

Key Words: emotions • gender • police • power • secrecy • violence

Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 7, No. 3, 363-387 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/13624806030073006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
U. Soni-Sinha
Dynamics of the `field': multiple standpoints, narrative and shifting positionality in multisited research
Qualitative Research, September 1, 2008; 8(4): 515 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
M. K. Huggins and S. Rodrigues
Kids Working on Paulista Avenue
Childhood, November 1, 2004; 11(4): 495 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]