Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theoretical Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Stokkom, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Moral emotions in restorative justice conferences

Managing shame, designing empathy

Bas Van Stokkom

University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

This article deals with the emotional dynamics of restorative conferences, focusing on the functions of shame, as enunciated in the theories of Moore, Scheff and Retzinger. According to these researchers, the restorative justice conferences aim to redirect aggressive emotions and elicit shame and other hurt-revealing emotions that can lead to empathy. These approaches are confronted with the views of the guilt-theorists Tangney and Baumeister who argue that guilt is related to empathy and reparation, whereas shame tends to provoke avoidance or rejection of responsibility. The view that guilt is the more moral emotion appears to turn Braithwaite’s theory of reintegrative shaming upside down. In accordance with recent research results of the Braithwaite group, it is concluded that guilt is an important aspect of the restorative process. But guilt has limited affect resonance possibilities, misses the other-regarding aspects of remorse and does not seem to incite the offender to reconsider his or her identity. In conclusion, it is argued that (reintegrative) ‘shaming’ is a dubious concept.

Key Words: guilt • reintegrative shaming • remorse • restorative justice • shame

Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 339-360 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/136248060200600306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
K. Murphy and N. Harris
SHAMING, SHAME AND RECIDIVISM: A Test of Reintegrative Shaming Theory in the White-Collar Crime Context
Br. J. Criminol., November 1, 2007; 47(6): 900 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
J. Stubbs
Beyond apology?: Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 169 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
J. Dignan, A. Atkinson, H. Atkinson, M. Howes, J. Johnstone, G. Robinson, J. Shapland, and A. Sorsby
Staging restorative justice encounters against a criminal justice backdrop: A dramaturgical analysis
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2007; 7(1): 5 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
N. Harris, L. Walgrave, and J. Braithwaite
Emotional Dynamics in Restorative Conferences
Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2004; 8(2): 191 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]