This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schinkel, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The modernist myth in criminology

Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

In this contribution, Hirschi’s widely influential social bond theory is criticized on logical and theoretical grounds. Central to this critique is the fact that the social bond theory defines crime and the criminal as not being part of (‘conventional’) ‘society’. In that respect, the social bond theory is seen as merely one exponent of what may be called ‘modernist’ criminology. Characteristic of modernist social theory is an abstraction from the social, which presupposes certain legitimized social constructions of ‘society’ to be naturally what society consists of. Thus, in scientific, political and popular discourse, ‘reintegration’ of the criminal can be propagated. This article questions such modernist, static, yet taken-for-granted conceptions of ‘society’, ‘crime’ and ‘integration’, calling instead for a study of the structural relations that separate the normal (‘society’) from the criminal.

Key Words: control theory • criminological theory • modernism • Travis Hirschi

Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 6, No. 2, 123-144 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/136248060200600201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Schinkel 'Illegal Aliens' and the State, or: Bare Bodies vs the Zombie International Sociology, November 1, 2009; 24(6): 779 - 806. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Mascini and D. Houtman Rehabilitation and Repression: Reassessing their Ideological Embeddedness Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2006; 46(5): 822 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Coutin Contesting criminality: Illegal immigration and the spatialization of legality Theoretical Criminology, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 5 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Schinkel The Will to Violence Theoretical Criminology, February 1, 2004; 8(1): 5 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]