This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by ULMER, J. T. Articles by SPENCER, J. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Contributions of an Interactionist Approach to Research and Theory on Criminal Careers

Purdue University, Indiana, USA

J. WILLIAM SPENCER

Purdue University, Indiana, USA

The term `criminal career' is treated in different ways by two distinct approaches, with differing ontological assumptions about human social behavior—a positivist approach and a pragmatist/ symbolic interactionist approach. Our major argument is that those interested in criminal careers and in stability and change in `criminal propensity' have much to gain by attending to symbolic interactionist conceptions of careers in crime and deviance, which are based on pragmatist rather than positivist ontological assumptions. These symbolic interactionist conceptions of criminal careers emphasize that continuity and change are inseparable, and that social constraints and opportunities, socialization, and even biology may influence, but never totally determine the contingencies and choices involved in criminal activity throughout the life course. Such symbolic interactionist conceptions would therefore provide those interested in both quantitative and qualitative research on criminal careers with a theoretical framework that makes sense of individual level indeterminacy, and stability and change in criminal activity over the life course.

Key Words: crime • criminal careers • criminology • deviance • interactionism

Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 95-124 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1362480699003001005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Presser The narratives of offenders Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2009; 13(2): 177 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Schlosser Issues in Interviewing Inmates: Navigating the Methodological Landmines of Prison Research Qualitative Inquiry, December 1, 2008; 14(8): 1500 - 1525. [Abstract] [PDF]