This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chamlin, M. B. Articles by Cochran, J. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An evaluation of the assumptions that underlie institutional anomie theory

University of Cincinnati, USA

John K. Cochran

University of South Florida, USA

Messner and Rosenfeld's institutional anomie theory [IAT] postulates that a pervasive cultural mandate to obtain material wealth, coupled with an anomic normative environment that arises from a pronounced imbalance of power in favor of the economy over all other societal institutions, is responsible for the high rates of serious crime found in the United States. Though intuitively appealing, this perspective is not readily amenable to falsification. Consequently, most empirical evaluations of institutional anomie theory have examined the additive and multiplicative effects of the structural antecedents of the institutional imbalance of power and anomie on violent and property crime rates. Our research takes a different tack. We examine the theory's underlying assumptions and suggest that the applicability of IAT may be limited to advanced, western nation-states.

Key Words: institutional anomie • macrosocial theory • theory falsification

Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 39-61 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1362480607072734


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?