Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theoretical Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MATHIESEN, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Viewer Society

Michel Foucault's `Panopticon' Revisited

THOMAS MATHIESEN

University of Oslo, Norway

The article takes its point of departure in one limited and consciously selected aspect of Michel Foucault's use of Jeremy Bentham's concept of `Panopticon': in his book Discipline and Punish, the aspect of surveillance, and the emphasis on a fundamental change and break which presumably occurred in the 1800s from social and theatrical arrangements, where the many saw the few, to modern surveillance activities where the few see the many. It is maintained that Foucault contributes in an important way to our understanding of and sensitivity regarding modern surveillance systems and practices, which are expanding at an accelerating rate, but that he overlooks an opposite process of great significance which has occurred simultaneously and at an equally accelerated rate: the mass media, and especially television, which today bring the many — literally hundreds of millions of people at the same time — with great force to see and admire the few. In contrast to Foucault's panoptical process, the latter process is referred to as synoptical. Together, the processes situate us in a viewer society in a two-way and double sense. This article explores the developmental parallels and relationships between Panopticon and Synopticon, as well as their reciprocal functions. It is maintained that the control and discipline of the `soul', that is, the creation of human beings who control themselves through self-control and who thus fit neatly into a so-called democratic capitalist society, is a task which is actually fulfilled by modern Synopticon, whereas Foucault saw it as a function of Panopticon.

Key Words: Foucault • mass media • Panopticon • surveillance • Synopticon

Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 215-234 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1362480697001002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
L. Hempel and E. Topfer
The Surveillance Consensus: Reviewing the Politics of CCTV in Three European Countries
European Journal of Criminology, March 1, 2009; 6(2): 157 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
M. Welch
Guantanamo Bay as a Foucauldian Phenomenon: An Analysis of Penal Discourse, Technologies, and Resistance
The Prison Journal, March 1, 2009; 89(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Legal StudiesHome page
S. Pemberton
Demystifying Deaths in Police Custody: Challenging State Talk
Social Legal Studies, June 1, 2008; 17(2): 237 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
W. de Lint, S. Virta, and J. E. Deukmedjian
The Simulation of Crime Control: A Shift in Policing?
American Behavioral Scientist, August 1, 2007; 50(12): 1631 - 1647.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
A. Brighenti
Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences
Current Sociology, May 1, 2007; 55(3): 323 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
P. Carlen
Book Review: Rethinking the political economy of punishment: Perspectives on post-Fordism and penal politics, Creating criminals: Prisoners and people in a market society
Punishment Society, April 1, 2007; 9(2): 221 - 223.
[PDF]


Home page
PolicingHome page
J. Sheptycki
High Policing in the Security Control Society
Policing, January 1, 2007; 1(1): 70 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
M. Levi
The Media Construction of Financial White-Collar Crimes
Br. J. Criminol., November 1, 2006; 46(6): 1037 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Theory Culture SocietyHome page
M. Andrejevic
Nothing Comes Between Me and My CPU: Smart Clothes and 'Ubiquitous' Computing
Theory Culture Society, June 1, 2005; 22(3): 101 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
R. Penfold
The Star's Image, Victimization and Celebrity Culture
Punishment Society, July 1, 2004; 6(3): 289 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
G. Elmer
A Diagram of Panoptic Surveillance
New Media Society, June 1, 2003; 5(2): 231 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Legal StudiesHome page
D. Cowan
`Rage at Westsinster': Sociolegal Reflections on the Power of Sale
Social Legal Studies, June 1, 2003; 12(2): 177 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Visual CultureHome page
E. Guano
Ruining the President's spectacle: theatricality and telepolitics in the Buenos Aires public sphere
Journal of Visual Culture, December 1, 2002; 1(3): 303 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Television New MediaHome page
G. Palmer
Big Brother: An Experiment in Governance
Television New Media, August 1, 2002; 3(3): 295 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
M. G. Petrunik
Managing Unacceptable Risk: Sex Offenders, Community Response, and Social Policy in the United States and Canada
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2002; 46(4): 483 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
T. MATHIESEN
Television, Public Space and Prison Population: A Commentary on Mauer and Simon
Punishment Society, January 1, 2001; 3(1): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]